Wednesday, July 15, 2009


Lawless

“Lawless are they that make their wills their law.”
-William Shakespeare

Well, Toads and Toadettes,

It’s a long hot summer here in the Midwestern south. The Toad pond is a foot down, and the ice machine has been on the “two cube a day” production plan. The local grocery ran out of frozen strawberries on the eve of the Toad’s annual “Big Berries n’ Booze Bash”—a much bigger event than Willy’s Barbecue a state or two closer to the Rio Grande, let me tell you. All that and it’s, wait for it, diocesan synod season amongst the U.S. continuing Anglican churches.

Ordinarily, the Toad doesn’t involve himself in these events, which customarily are parades of vestments more ornate in inverse proportion to the size of the “jurisdiction” holding the event. Many of these “synods” largely resemble an ecclesiastical version of the bar scene from the very first Star Wars film down to finely dressed prelates from the Holy Anglican Orthodox Communion of Rigel III (Original Jurisdiction) actually playing Golden Harps Are Sounding on their proboscis. Nope, the Toad usually is too busy blending berries by the pond and working out rum ratios. Rawk.*

But, every now and again, a bit of news becomes so tantalizing that the Toad can’t pass it by. It’s a bit like a fat June bug in tongue range just after lunch. The Toad doesn’t need it, but zaps it anyway just because it’s there. So it is when a “jurisdiction”, or at least a part of it, goes rogue.
Now, the Toad likes a good summer mystery too, so he’s just going to throw out a few facts as passed to him in a brown paper bag, by a brown-shoed square in the dead of the night recently. The guy heard the blender and invited himself over. Three or four Strawberry Hazes and this guy would have admitted to kidnapping the Lindbergh baby. Rawk.* As it was, he just spilled a little story I call Lawless. (Ok, I could call it the “the bishop who wouldn’t leave and his crafty minions”, but it’s too wordy for summer, pally.)

Here’s clue number one, boys and girls. What happens when a bishop reaches mandatory retirement age in the church? He retires. At least, in the Toad’s corner of Christendom, he puts in his retirement papers and maybe hangs around until some guy with a fancier hat gets a new bishop into play. Not for this guy, bunky. For three, count ‘em three years his hand-picked standing committee has the good old bish stay on by “acclamation” (trans. “You don’t get a vote people. He stays, and we’ll punish anyone who says otherwise.”) No squawks, no squeaks.

Clue number two is pretty close. The aforesaid bishop for life tends to run educated clergy out of his diocese as quickly as he can. “And why is this, pray tell?” the Toad asked his sozzled visitor. “No opposition,” was the answer. Seems the bish never really went to a legitimate seminary of any kind. So too most of his clergy including several of his thugs on the aforesaid standing committee. Clergy like that get ideas—like why aren’t we playing by the rules. Bunch of stiffs.

At the same time, at least one highly-valued “clergyman” masquerading as a Dominican Friar (interesting enough in that he’s married with children) seems to have no record of an ordination—anywhere. It’s ok, though, boys and girls, he didn’t have a medical license either when authorities got squeamish about him giving exams and writing scrips in a clinic down south. Whoa! No problem there. Rawk, rawk.*

But, wait, there’s more—another clue. This “synod” passed changes to its local canons all designed to keep the bish in a paying job, and to give the lawyer for the bish a vote on the standing committee. This assures old miter-head a berth until the cows come home. Enforcement of these changes was vigorous at the hands of the lawyer who wrote them up for the his ecclesiastical boss and apparently made up procedural rules as he went along. Not an obstacle, this made up set of procedures, as we shall see.

One more little problem, here boys and girls, the legal Machiavelli behind all of this had been disbarred last January following some pretty interesting public opinions by the state supreme court. After all, it’s not just any legal eagle the court singles out for being a liar whilst plucking the old license. Nosiree! It’s a special, special kind of lawyer—one who never shared that little bit of inconsequential news with the people of the diocese, or with the national “denomination” for which he also is the lawyer. (They haven't got rid of him either, by the by.)
What would Perry Mason say? “Your honor, my investigator Paul Drake has uncovered some interesting information—my opposing counsel, having been exposed as a liar and all around poltroon, was disbarred six months ago and should be sitting in the gallery. I win.” Rawk, rawk, rawk.*

So, there it is, toads and toadettes, unqualified clergy running the show, bishops doing whatever they want, good clergy being run off, disbarred lawyers serving as diocesan and national chancellors. The only thing there hasn’t been is a property suit, or it would look exactly like…well…The Episcopal Church. (The Toad won't give away the entity--you have to do your own research, pally.) Raaawwwwk!*

At this point in the story, the Toad had to gently put a blanket over his peacefully sleeping guest—then roll him up in it and lock him in his car trunk until the guy sobered up. Then, a few Strawberry Hazes later, the Toad ruminated on lawlessness. Unless you are the Toad, you can’t just do what you want, pally. The problem with many continuing Anglicans, or Discontinuing Anglicans as a new blogster calls himself, is that they do the same darned stuff that the “other guys” do. Rule by whim, rule by terror, rule by whatever means necessary to put on and keep on a funny hat or ornate costume. It’s bush league Machiavellianism, and only hurts the little toads and toadettes.

It is Lawless. And not like the Toad’s main girl Lucy Lawless. Xena would make fast work of these lawless legions, and in a much better costume. Then she and the Toad would sit back to a pitcher of Strawberry Hazes, and never have to play guess the lawless jurisdiction again. But, until the warrior queen comes to put order in the house, here’s another secret recipe for summer fun. Seven or eight of these and Xena will be locking you in the trunk after your disbarment. Rawk!*

Strawberry Haze
Ingredients:
1 Shot White Rum
1 Shot De Kuyper Wild Strawberry
Top up Champagne
4 Strawberries
0.25 Shot Sugar Syrup

Remove the stalk from each strawberry and muddle these together in the base of a cocktail shaker. Add the White Rum and sugar syrup plus ice and shake well together. Fine strain into a flute or large martini glass. Top up with Champagne. Got it, bunky?

Yr. Obed. Serv.,

Roy Aldous Toad, DD-VS (Very Specious), LSMFT, D.Phil.
Prelate-Communion of Anglican Cranks in America (CACA) Original Jurisdiction (C'mon--you can't prove it's not real!)
*The Sound of One Toad Barking

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

bet my money on Bishop Joe Russo up in Orlando!

The side steppin' sandcrab

Fr. D. said...

This story is fairly accurate as reported by the toad. However, anyone who has known most of the players and their antics over the years will hardly be surprised. And for the record from a first hand account, the other bishops in that particular jurisdiction have been trying to get rid of that bishop and his band of merry men because they think that his presence is hindering the jurisdiction from succeeding in its bid to unite in some manner with Rome. They had hoped that his receiving the psuedo "medical professional" and equally psuedo Dominican would be enough to force the Disney bishop to accept retirement, but alas.
Fr. D.

Anonymous said...

This the same jurisdiction whose chancellor is a disbarred lawyer?

Lord have Mercy!

Anonymous said...

The "Dominican" you refer to is no longer with the jurisdiction to which you refer.

Anonymous said...

To clarify the point: Fr. D apparently refers to the "medical professional" and "pseudo Dominican" as if they are two different persons. They are not, as this is one individual. This person is no longer with the jurisdiction.

It is hard to swallow that the Bishop would be forced to retire because of one errant individual.

The Parsoun said...

The phony Dominican was written up on my blog, too. Hang on to your hats, folks, and soon there will be an entry of Geoffrey's about the antics of that wacky barrister who hated catholics almost as much as he hates sobriety!

Anonymous said...

The disbarred lawyer is also the national chancellor of the ACA right?

Their HOB must know he is disbarred. They have not fired him?
If he is giving legal advise that constitutes a felony doesn't it?

Scandalous!

Guess that thing about dissembling & cloaking in the BCP Confession must not include Bishops and Chancellors.

Shame Falk. Shame Hepworth.

These guys think the mothership from Rome is going to beam them up when they can't even run their own affairs? Ha!

That's all they need is divorced bishops (speaking of affairs) with an alias to cloak their indiscretion and a house of bishops that has no spine to fire a crooked ex lawyer.

Makes one wonder what he has on them!

William Tell

Anonymous said...

Lord have mercy upon Rome should they receive such people.

BCP Catholic

Ken said...

It is hard to swallow that the Bishop would be forced to retire because of one errant individual.

First, the bishop should retire because he reached the retirement age. That is the rule

Second, it isn't the fact that the bishop appointed someone who latter erred that is the problem. It is the fact that the bishop appointed someone without properly investigating the candidate's credentials, something he is required to do.

Ken said...

To be fair to the ACA, any number of shenanigans can be laid at the feet of the RCC's bishops in the US. Weakland, Mahoney, etc.

A short trip to the Diogenes blog is enlightening.

Anonymous said...

He who is without sin cast the first stone....people who live in Glass houses do throw stones....
comments must be approved by the blog author....so I guess this will not be approved since it does not HANG anyone.....God have mercy on all of us

R. Toad said...

Yo, "Anonymous",
At least the most recent "Anonymous". Bunky, you obviously don't keep up with the Toad, or, at least any of the columns that don't grill up your own particular sacred cow. The Toad also takes note of the fact that you don't question the truth of his rant. You can only whine about "fairness".
Oh, yeah, and to the other "Anonymous" (they proliferate like wire coat hagers in a darkened closet, these Anonymi), this ain't about one specious MD turned friar. That's just one Filbert in the nut jar. It's about disbarred chancellors, untrained clergy, and bishops who think they are kings. Ooops, at least kings have to follow their own rules sometimes.
Here's a clue, pally, the light has been shown on the cockroaches in your kitchen, maybe its time to get out the proverbial ecclesiastical roach motel. Rawk.*
By the way...the Toad lives in a pond and rakes mud. Mud, unlike stones,can be washed off. Got a hose, bunky? Rawk, rawk.*
Your Obed. Serv.,
Roy Aldous Toad, DMR (Hon.)-- Doctor of Muck Raking (Honorary)

Anonymous said...

“Lawless are they that make their wills their law.”

William Shakespeare

Anonymous said...

Interesting that Anon would say:

"He who is without sin cast the first stone....people who live in Glass houses do throw stones....
comments must be approved by the blog author....so I guess this will not be approved since it does not HANG anyone.....God have mercy on all of us"

Anonymous makes pretense to quotes Scripture but who really has “cast the first stone” and who has “hung” whom?

The Pastoral Epistles leave no uncertain qualification for the office of bishop ... a man of one wife" and the Commandments clearly prohibit coveting & lying as does the Summary.

The 39 Articles say it is repugnant to use one passage of Scripture over against another. Yet here Anon has done just that: while not refuting the allegation (so he believes or knows it to be true) he seems to simply dislike the revealing of persons living a lie. One would expect such to be very close to those in question, wolves in sheep's clothing. SO is it casting a stone to reveal those very Office is in defiance of Scripture? What a strange teaching.

The BCP in the General Confession says we should “not cloak nor dissemble." But both the figures mentioned do that in stride without regard to their own souls or of those in their charge. O what reward awaits such men.

Intentional or a matter of ignorance we do not know their hearts but God does; either way the comments seem to bear out the Toads criticism of "uneducated clergy" or shysters.

Can the blind lead the blind or worse can the dissembler and cloaker lead others to a path of holiness? Scripture also calls for those who would lead to spotless and blameless. How does such a man presume to preside over the Blessed Sacrament and call others to repentance? Is this not a self lynching?

Anons seems to have a beam in his eye here! Do these people have no fear of God?

William Tell

Anonymous said...

http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=11241

I would like to know if the Toad sees a corollary or parallel?

Al

Anonymous said...

Have you ever considered seeking professional help?

Gotcha! Enjoyed reading your unique prose.

I wonder how Hepworth sleeps at night ....

African Anglican